Smart InvestorValidate your strategy
Analyzed strategies

NVDA strategy validation

Doesn't hold upIt was not profitable in training or out of sample.

Validated on 5-minute candles

Validated Oct 28, 2026 — may not reflect a later revision

Max drawdown
−40.6%
largest fall from a peak, net of costs
Average per trade
−11.2 bp
net of costs
Profit factor
0.47 → 0.97
in-sample → out-of-sample
Win rate
16% → 25%
in-sample → out-of-sample
Trades
330
247 in-sample · 83 out-of-sample
Backtest curve: cumulative result, net of costs
Start

Previous day levels with retracement to the gap The strategy operates long and short on 5‑minute candles within the 09:40–15:30 ET window, Monday through Friday. Training period It generated numerous trades but showed consistent losses. The profit factor was very low, indicating that losses far outweighed gains. Capital drawdown was significant, with a substantial maximum retracement. The win rate was very low, reflecting that most trades were losing. Out‑of‑sample period Performance improved markedly compared to training: the profit factor approached neutrality, total losses were minimal, and the maximum retracement dropped dramatically. The win rate increased, although it remained low. However, the strategy continued to generate net losses, albeit very small in magnitude. Verdict Although out‑of‑sample behaviour was substantially better, the strategy remains losing in both periods. It does not meet the required profitability criteria. Verdict: rejected, was not profitable in training or out‑of‑sample. Exits: take profit at a price level, stop‑loss at a price level, short side: take profit at a price level and stop‑loss at a price level; automatic close at the end of the session if still open; maximum one trade per day. Net results include a 0.10% cost per trade. Past results do not guarantee future results.

Results by period

MetricIn-sampleJan 2024 – Jun 2025Out-of-sampleJul 2025 – Dec 2025
Trades24783
Win rate16%25%
Profit factor0.470.97
Avg. win0.84%0.71%
Avg. loss-0.33%-0.25%
Best trade3.33%1.84%
Worst trade-2.57%-0.96%
Longs247 (16%)83 (25%)
Shorts00
Total return-36.67%-0.42%
Download the trades

Requires signing in; the account is free.

Strategy tested

In the one‑hour time frame, it marks the previous day’s high and low. Then it switches to the 5‑minute time frame and waits for the price to break this liquidity in any direction: if it breaks upwards, it looks for short trades; if it breaks downwards, it looks for long trades. Once the direction is identified, it waits for a structure break in the opposite direction to the initial break (if it broke downwards, it waits for a structure break upwards), ensuring that this structure break occurs above the liquidity of the previous day’s high. Then it waits for the price to enter a Fair Value Gap. Place the stop‑loss below recent lows. Take profit at the previous day’s high that you marked in step 1.

What we assumed

What about your strategy?

Describe it in your own words or paste a video link (YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, X or Facebook). We test it the same way as this one: real data, trading costs and an out-of-sample test period.

Creating an account is free and includes welcome credits.

More analyzed strategies

See all

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Any past result shown here reflects historical data and does not guarantee similar outcomes going forward.

This content is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Backtested and simulated results are hypothetical and do not represent actual trading. Simulated performance has inherent limitations and may differ significantly from live results due to market conditions, slippage, and other factors.