AAPL strategy validation
Validated on 5-minute candles
Validated Oct 27, 2026 — may not reflect a later revision
- Max drawdown
- −5.1%
- largest fall from a peak, net of costs
- Average per trade
- −4.3 bp
- net of costs
- Profit factor
- 0.76 → 0.95
- in-sample → out-of-sample
- Win rate
- 41% → 45%
- in-sample → out-of-sample
- Trades
- 105
- 85 in-sample · 20 out-of-sample
Backtest analysis: Opening range with pullback to gap, confirmation candle The strategy trades long and short depending on the side of the gap formed after breaking the levels of the first session candle (09:30-09:35 ET). It seeks entries through engulfing patterns when the price pulls back to the gap within the next 12 candles. During the training period, the strategy produced consistent losses. The profit factor was low, indicating that losses significantly outweighed gains. The maximum pullback was considerable. In the out‑of‑sample period, the win rate increased. However, the strategy continued to lose money, though with a smaller maximum pullback. The relative improvement suggests some consistency in behavior between the two periods, but insufficient to reverse net losses. Limitations: operates on a single symbol, maximum one trade per day. Verdict: rejected, not profitable in training or out‑of‑sample. Exits: take profit 0.6%, stop‑loss 0.3%, short side: take profit 0.6% and stop‑loss 0.3%; automatic close at session end if still open; maximum one trade per day. Net results with a 0.10% transaction cost per trade. Past results do not guarantee future performance.
Results by period
| Metric | In-sampleJan 2024 – Jun 2025 | Out-of-sampleJul 2025 – Dec 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Trades | 85 | 20 |
| Win rate | 41% | 45% |
| Profit factor | 0.76 | 0.95 |
| Avg. win | 0.40% | 0.42% |
| Avg. loss | -0.37% | -0.36% |
| Best trade | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Worst trade | -0.40% | -0.40% |
| Longs | 38 (47%) | 12 (42%) |
| Shorts | 47 (36%) | 8 (50%) |
| Total return | -4.33% | -0.21% |
Requires signing in; the account is free.
Strategy tested
ORB Strategy (Opening Range Breakout) or first candle rule: Sit on the chart at 9:30 AM New York time on a 5‑minute timeframe and wait for the first candle to form (between 9:30 and 9:35). Observe if the price approaches one of the levels (high or low of that candle) and leaves a void (fair value gap) between the last two candles, indicating real‑strength price movement. Once this fair value gap forms, wait for the price to return to that gap. Entry confirmation is an engulfing candle that closes within the gap. Enter the trade when this engulfing candle forms. The risk‑reward target is 1 to 2 (the expected profit is double the assumed risk).
What we assumed
- APPROXIMATE: the video does not state where the stop goes; a 0.3% stop adjusted to the timeframe was used. Review this rule before confirming: it completely changes the strategy’s risk.
- Return to the gap is accepted within any of the next 12 candles after its formation (default window). The valid gap is the one that results from breaking the level: the previous candle closes on that side and the central on the other.
- Risk‑reward target 1:2 calculated from entry and stop.
- Trade window 09:40-15:30 ET, Monday‑Friday: the system calculates it so that levels and price zones do not use candles from the previous session (only reference sizes, such as an average range, can read them).
- Both directions are modeled: the opposite (short) uses the same rules with mirrored levels. The engine allows at most one trade per day, the first signal of either side.
More analyzed strategies
See allPast performance is not indicative of future results. Any past result shown here reflects historical data and does not guarantee similar outcomes going forward.
This content is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Backtested and simulated results are hypothetical and do not represent actual trading. Simulated performance has inherent limitations and may differ significantly from live results due to market conditions, slippage, and other factors.